BIM Services
Concept to fabrication — coordinated Revit models, clash-free federated files and drawing sets your field crews can build from.
All services
BIM Consulting
Standards, workflows and ISO 19650 processes that make BIM repeatable across every project your firm takes on.
All services
Staffing & Design Support
Trained modelers and engineers working in your time zone, to your standards — scale up in days, not hiring cycles.
BIM Staffing
Design Support
BIM insights, how-tos and industry deep dives for AEC teams.
Free downloadable guides for precon, VDC and BIM leaders.
Monthly BIM insights and project lessons in your inbox.
ROI Calculator and ISO 19650 readiness checklist.
Real projects with results in numbers, across five verticals.
Walkthroughs, model demos and project explainers.
What Is BIM Coordination? Clash Detection, LOD, and the Federated Model Explained
In-House BIM Team vs Outsourcing: What It Actually Costs a U.S. Firm
ISO 19650 Explained: What U.S. AEC Firms Need to Know Before Their Next Bid
Read more40-Story Office Tower, Dallas — 12 Trades Coordinated Clash-Free
420,000 sq ft of Class A commercial delivered at LOD 350 — full coordination, clash resolution and model-linked quantity takeoffs across every discipline.
Get to know how, since 2004, Excelize grew into the BIM partner U.S. AEC firms trust — 300+ clients served and 2,500+ projects delivered end to end.
Learn MoreWho We Are
How We Work
Trust
Careers
Structured support for moving from CAD, or from BIM used in name only, to a level of BIM your whole team actually works in, staged by where your firm stands today, not a single firmwide leap.
BIM adoption rarely fails because a firm picked the wrong software. It fails because the jump from where a team actually works, still largely 2D, or 3D used mainly for visuals, to full collaborative BIM gets treated as one leap instead of a series of levels. Excelize has been guiding construction companies and specialty firms through that migration from CAD since 2004, staging the move so each level is actually usable before the next one starts.
BIM Adoption is the structured process of moving a firm from its current level of BIM use to the next one, and eventually toward full collaborative BIM. It starts wherever a firm actually is: still working primarily in 2D drafting with 3D used for visuals and approval documentation, or already modeling in 3D but sharing data through disconnected files rather than a Common Data Environment. Adoption is distinct from Strategy Consulting, which sets the long-term roadmap and standards, and from Implementation, which executes a plan on real projects. Adoption is the layer in between: helping a firm actually progress from one level of BIM maturity to the next, with the training and process support that make each level stick before the next one is introduced.
A firm buys BIM software and calls itself a BIM firm, while most day-to-day work still happens the old way, in 2D, with 3D produced late and mainly for presentation rather than coordination.
A team reaches a working level of 3D modeling but never moves to genuine electronic data sharing through a Common Data Environment, so the collaboration benefits BIM is supposed to deliver never materialize.
Adoption gets treated as a single firmwide switch instead of a staged migration, so the firm either stalls at an early level indefinitely or pushes for a level of collaborative BIM the team isn't actually ready to sustain.
That gap costs more than a slow rollout. Countries that have mandated BIM on public works have shown what full adoption can deliver; firms stuck partway through the migration get the cost of the software without the return that the later levels are supposed to provide.
An honest read on where your firm actually sits today, working primarily in 2D, using 3D mainly for visualization, or already collaborating through a shared data environment, so the next step is realistic, not aspirational.
A defined sequence for moving from your current level to the next, rather than a single jump to full collaborative BIM regardless of where the team is starting from.
Guidance on establishing electronic data sharing through a CDE, the step that separates firms using 3D for visuals from firms actually collaborating through BIM.
Training is scoped to the specific level your firm is moving toward, so staff are learning what the next stage of adoption actually requires, not a generic BIM course.
Syncing the tools and technology your firm adopts with where the industry and your specific project types are heading, so adoption decisions hold up as standards evolve.
A check-in at each level of the adoption path, confirming the team is actually working at that level before moving to the next, rather than assuming progress based on a rollout calendar alone.
We assess where your firm actually stands today, current tools, current workflows, and how much of daily work happens in 2D versus true collaborative BIM.
We define the sequence of levels your firm needs to move through and what needs to be true at each stage before advancing to the next.
Where the next stage requires it, we support setting up the Common Data Environment and the processes for electronic data sharing that the stage depends on.
We deliver training scoped specifically to what the next level of adoption requires, not a generic software course disconnected from where your firm is headed.
We check that the team is genuinely working at the new level before recommending the next stage, so adoption holds up rather than reverting once support ends.
A firm still largely in 2D typically needs the first stage focused on getting 3D modeling genuinely into daily use, not just producing visuals for client presentations. A firm already modeling in 3D but sharing files manually usually needs the next stage centered on establishing a real Common Data Environment, since that's what actually unlocks collaboration. A firm with CDE in place but inconsistent use across offices or project teams often needs the adoption work focused less on new technology and more on getting existing capability used consistently.
Consultants work out of New Jersey and California, on U.S. hours, and scope the staged path to your firm's actual starting level rather than a fixed rollout template.
Connecting your BIM, estimation, and procurement systems once adoption sticks.
Explore
Whether that's still mostly 2D, 3D without real data sharing, or somewhere further along, that starting point defines the staged path. Send us where things stand, and a sample comes back in 2 to 3 days.